Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davis v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1989No. 2547 C.D. 1988Published

1Dissent

CRUMLISH, Jr., President Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent.

Since our Supreme Court’s Yurechko holding, this Court has interpreted the reasonable excuse provision of Section 5522(a)(2) to allow an untimely notice of claim based on ignorance of the law coupled with: an inability to understand English, Ramon v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety, 124 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 416, 556 A.2d 919 (1989); a medical misdiagnosis preventing the appellant from knowing the extent of her injuries during the months immediately following the incident, Hoy v. SEPTA, 129 Pa. Commonwealth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ramon v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Hoy v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Augusta v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API