Davis v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
CRUMLISH, Jr., President Judge,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent.
Since our Supreme Court’s Yurechko holding, this Court has interpreted the reasonable excuse provision of Section 5522(a)(2) to allow an untimely notice of claim based on ignorance of the law coupled with: an inability to understand English, Ramon v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety, 124 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 416, 556 A.2d 919 (1989); a medical misdiagnosis preventing the appellant from knowing the extent of her injuries during the months immediately following the incident, Hoy v. SEPTA, 129 Pa. Commonwealth…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ramon v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Hoy v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Augusta v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989