Legal Opinion

Hoy v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 1989No. Appeal 1375 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

Alice Hoy (Appellant) has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County granting a motion for summary judgment filed by Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA). The trial court’s grant of summary judgment was based upon Appellant’s failure to comply with the six months’ notice provision of 42 Pa.C.S. § 5522. For the reasons set forth herein, we hereby vacate the trial court’s order and remand the matter to that court for further findings of fact.

On January 11, 1985, while disembarking from a SEPTA train, Appellant slipped on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Kuehner Et Ux. v. ParsonsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Yurechko v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Graffigna v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Ramon v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Borough of Malvern v. K.R.I. Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Abernethy v. WilliamsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Bissey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Magill v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Davis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API