Legal Opinion

Appeal of Whaland

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 6, 1982No. 81-152PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this tax abatement case is whether the plaintiff, Ruth Whaland, is paying a disproportionate share of taxes. We hold that she has failed to prove disproportionality and affirm.

The plaintiff bought a home in Concord for $120,000 in the summer of 1978. During the same summer, professional appraisers conducted a reappraisal of all real property in the city and initially assigned to the plaintiffs property an assessed value of $68,200. The appraisers later increased the assessed value to $95,200. The plaintiff applied to the city board of assessors for an abatement of her 1979 real…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berthiaume v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Stevens v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. Duval v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  4. Bedford Development Co. v. Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Town of HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  2. Appeal of CannataSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API