Legal Opinion

Appeal of Cannata

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1987No. 86-167PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The Cannatas (hereinafter taxpayers) appeal from an order of the board of tax and land appeals pursuant to RSA 76:16-a, V (Supp. 1986). We affirm the board’s ruling.

*400The taxpayers appeal the assessment of four undeveloped lots. The Town of Deerfield has classified all residential lots into five grades, taking into account a variety of factors related to dimension, topography, and soil quality. Each grade, or class, is assigned an assessment value. The town valued all class C lots at $10,000. The town classified the four lots involved in this appeal as class C lots, resulting in a total…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Appeal of Town of SunapeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
  3. Brock v. FarmingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1953
  4. Appeal of WhalandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LSP Ass'n v. Town of GilfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API