Appeal of Cannata
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
The Cannatas (hereinafter taxpayers) appeal from an order of the board of tax and land appeals pursuant to RSA 76:16-a, V (Supp. 1986). We affirm the board’s ruling.
*400The taxpayers appeal the assessment of four undeveloped lots. The Town of Deerfield has classified all residential lots into five grades, taking into account a variety of factors related to dimension, topography, and soil quality. Each grade, or class, is assigned an assessment value. The town valued all class C lots at $10,000. The town classified the four lots involved in this appeal as class C lots, resulting in a total…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Appeal of Town of SunapeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
- Brock v. FarmingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1953
- Appeal of WhalandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
3Cited by1 opinion
- LSP Ass'n v. Town of GilfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997