Legal Opinion

Lozano v. Meyers

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1929No. 1257—5284PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, P. J.

This suit was brought by G. M. Lozano and wife against E. J. Meyers, W. R. Mulhausen, R. W. Mulhausen, and A. G. Purdy, seeking to cancel two promissory notes and a purported mechanic’s lien, on account of failure of the consideration for which the notes were executed. The notes were executed by Lozano on May 10, 1927, one for $45,000, and the other for $2,000. Purdy, by cross-action, claimed to be holder of the $2,000 note in due course, and sought recovery thereon. The case was tried before the court without a jury.

Judgment was rendered in favor of the Lozanos, canceling the $45,000 note…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lozano v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cont'nal Natl. Bk. of Ft. Worth v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Carter v. South Texas Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API