Wright v. Jeckle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Chambers, J.
We are asked today to decide whether RCW 19.68.010 is an “antikickback” statute or an antiprofit statute. We conclude the legislature intended to prohibit kickbacks, not profits. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court.1
FACTS
¶2 Since the early 1980s, Dr. Milan Jeckle has operated a Spokane Valley medical clinic. He often dispensed, at a profit, a prescription drug combination commonly known as “fen-phen”2 to patients seeking to lose weight. These patients included plaintiffs Karen Wright, Rosa Lee Johnson, and Karla Seastrom. Fen-phen has since been associated with significant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Albert Oran Terry Adolphs Philip Morris James Doyle Lupo Paul H. Maurer, Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Others Similarly Situated v. John R. Stafford Robert G. Blount Joseph J. Carr Louis L. Hoynes, Jr. William J. Murray David M. Olivier John R. Considine Paul J. Jones Fred Hassan American Home Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lowy v. PeaceHealthWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Chadwick Farms Owners Ass'n v. FHC LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Rivas v. Overlake Hosp. Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.