Mabon v. Kulongoski
Oregon Supreme Court
(Consolidated for Argument and Opinion)
1Opinion of the Court
902 P.2d 1171 (1995)
322 Or. 65
Lon T. MABON, Petitioner,
v.
Theodore R. KULONGOSKI, Attorney General of the State of Oregon, Respondent,
and
Daniel A. Rooney and Julie Davis, Intervenors.
Daniel A. ROONEY and Julie Davis, Petitioners,
v.
Theodore R. KULONGOSKI, Attorney General of the State of Oregon, Respondent.
SC S42051; S42055.
Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.
Argued and Submitted May 11, 1995.
Decided September 28, 1995.
Lawrence J. Hall, Silverton, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner Lon T. Mabon.
Charles F. Hinkle, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioners…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Mabon v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Mabon v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995