Legal Opinion

Crumm v. K. Murphy & Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County

Decided September 16, 2009No. CI-05-02780PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, J,

Pending before the court is the motion for partial summary judgment filed by defendant, K. Murphy & Company Inc. In its motion, defendant asserts that the addition to plaintiffs’ amended complaint of a claim for pain and suffering represents a new cause of action for bodily injury after the applicable statute of limitations had run. In the alternative, defendant argues that even if the allegations are not barred by the statute of limitations, damages for pain and suffering are not recoverable in an action for breach of contract and breach of warranty or under the Unfair Trade…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Phaff v. GernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Ferrer v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arndt v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Hagel v. v. Falcone, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. NELSON v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API