Legal Opinion

Estate of Stevic v. Bio-Medical Application of Ohio, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 2009No. 2008-0392PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, appellant-defendant contends that it may claim the benefit of the one-year “medical claim” statute of limitations contained in R.C. 2305.113(A) against a claim arising out of the medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of a person even though the claim is not asserted against one of the medical professionals or facilities (“providers”) specifically listed in R.C. 2305.113(E)(3).

{¶ 2} Because R.C. 2305.113(E) defines a “medical claim” for purposes of R.C. 2305.113(A) not only as a claim that arises out of the medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of a person but also as one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wachendorf v. ShaverOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. GuilbertOhio Supreme Court · 1897
  3. In re Estate of RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Estate of Stevic v. Bio-Medical, 2006 Ca 0095 (1-7-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Boley v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Franks v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Evans v. Hanger Prosthetics & Orthotics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  4. Chalmers v. HCR Manorcare, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Bartley v. Hearth & Care of Greenfield, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API