Haden v. Sioux City & Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Harrison District Court. — Hon. A. YanWagenen, Judge. Action for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, C. J.
This case was before in this court, and reversed. It is reported in 48 N. W. Rep. 733, and the facts need not be restated. The petition charges negligence on the part of the company in the separation of its train, and also negligence on the part of the brakeman in charge of the rear section, by which the plaintiff was injured. On the former appeal we held that there was an absence of evidence tending to establish negligence on the part of the defendant, and that the evidence, without conflict, showed negligence on the part of the plaintiff.
1 I. It seems to us that the verdict on this appeal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Deppe v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Frandsen v. C., R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Butler v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Malone v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Pierce v. Central Iowa R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Akeson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. HicksMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
- Tobey v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Stubbs v. Omaha, Kansas City & Eastern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1900
- Dunn v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.