Legal Opinion

Thompson Nat. Bank v. Corwine

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Decided November 9, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAFT, Circuit Judge.

The complainant is a judgment creditor of John W. Corwine, in the sum of $5,044, on a judgment recovered November 21, 1894. As such, it files its bill against John W. Cor-*775wine, Mary W. Lee, William I!. Lee, James D. Corwine, Eliza Cor-wine, John W. Barger, Kerziah I). Barger, Baehel M. Foster, Jane B. Foster, Peter B. Hayes and George D. Cole, partners as Hayes, Jones & Co., together with certain other judgment creditors of John W. Corwine, who filed cross bills seeking the same relief as the comida inant. The purpose of the bill and cross bills is to set aside as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blennerhassett v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Franklin Savings Bank v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Thompson Nat. Bank of Putnam v. CorwineU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API