RHP Bearings Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
I. Standard of Review
The Court will uphold Commerce’s rede-termination pursuant to the Court’s remand unless it is “unsupported by substantial evidence on the record, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(b)(l)(B)(i) (1994). Substantial evidence is “more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 477, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951) (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229, 59 S.Ct. 206, 83…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Baystate Alternative Staffing, Inc. v. HermanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.