Legal Opinion · Dissent

Doyle v. Union Bank & Trust Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1936No. 7,488Published

1DissentChief Justice Sands

This action was brought by plaintiff, Julia Doyle, against the Union Bank & Trust Company for damages sustained by her in the purchase of an Insull Utilities Investment Company $1,000 par value debenture from the defendant bank. She purchaser the debenture in November, 1929, for $910. By its terms it became due January 1, 1949, with an annual interest at 5 per cent. The Insull Company defaulted in its interest payments in February, 1932, went into a receivership in April, 1932, and at the time of the trial it appeared that the debenture had a par value of $1,000, but could be sold for $1.75,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Hotaling v. A. B. Leach & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Whiting v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Healy v. GinoffMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Lewis v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API