State v. Russell
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentAndersen, C. J.
(dissenting) — I dissent solely on the issue of the admissibility of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) evidence; such evidence should not have been admitted. My reasons follow.
While I recognize that reasonable minds can differ on this very complex issue, I am convinced by the record before us and the available scientific literature on the subject that *95PCR evidence is not yet generally accepted for use in the forensic setting by the relevant sciences.
The most important scientific publication on the subject of the forensic use of DNA evidence to date is an exhaustive…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- United States v. Randolph JakobetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Spencer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. KalakoskyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.