Manko v. City of Buffalo
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, DESMOND, THACHER and DYE, JJ. Taking no part: CONWAY, J. FULD, J., dissents in the following memorandum: Section 21 of the Civil Service Law, implementing the Constitution (N.Y. Const., art. V, § 6), commands preferences to war veterans in appointment and promotion. Under subdivision 7, denial of the required preference gives the veteran a cause of action for "damages".
Words are flexible and take on meaning from the history and purpose of the legislation. (See Towne v. Eisner,245 U.S. 418, 425, per HOLMES, J.)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Stiles v. Municipal CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sukup v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Sinicropi v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Artvale, Inc. v. Rugby Fabrics Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Golomb v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.