Legal Opinion

Hoxsey v. Feldman

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided June 11, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00061Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION KENNETH LOVELL HOXSEY, Plaintiff, No. C22-61-LTS-KEM vs. MEMORANDUM PAUL FELDMAN, et al., OPINION AND ORDER Defendants. ___________________________ I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before me on a motion (Doc. 29) for summary judgment filed by defendants Paul Feldman, David Rose, Mitchell Michel and Brannen Hudson. Plaintiff Kenneth Lovell Hoxsey has filed a resistance (Doc. 33) and defendants have filed a reply (Doc. 37). Oral argument is not necessary. See Local Rule 7(c). II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On June…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API