Legal Opinion
Pudelski v. Wilson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 14, 2009No. 07-3856PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLSCHUH, District Judge.
Petitioner John J. Pudelski (“Pudelski”) was convicted in state court of the murder of his infant daughter, and after appealing that conviction to the state courts he filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. The district court, adopting the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation in full, found no merit in Pudelski’s claims and dismissed the petition. Pudelski now appeals. Although the magistrate judge and district court improperly found that habeas relief was not available to Pudelski on his first ground for relief, we reach the merits…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Rebecca Shimel v. Millicent WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Henness v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Carter v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- James Mammone, III v. Charlotte JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Akins v. EasterlingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.