Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Stanley Ginsberg and Henry Ginsberg, Individually and as Copartners Now or Late Trading as Hensten Appliance Co., Bankrupts. Appeal of Stanley Ginsberg and Henry Ginsberg

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 22, 1955No. 11380Published

1Opinion of the Court

219 F.2d 472

In the Matter of Stanley GINSBERG and Henry Ginsberg, Individually and as Copartners Now or Late Trading as Hensten Appliance Co., Bankrupts.

APPEAL of Stanley GINSBERG and Henry Ginsberg.

No. 11380.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued December 21, 1954.

Decided March 1, 1955.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1955.

Marshall H. Morgan, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Nathan Lavine, Philadelphia, Pa. (Miller, Adelman & Lavine, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before MARIS and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges, and LORD, District Judge.

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

1

This is an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Francis v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Liberty Nat. Bank of Roanoke, Va. v. BearSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Myers v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Strause v. HooperDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1901
  5. In re GinsbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API