Legal Opinion

CANDEUB v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided October 24, 2006No. 5:06-cv-00063PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOSEPH G. SCOVILLE, United States Magistrate Judge.

This is a civil action brought by two pro se plaintiffs against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. Plaintiff Adam Candeub is an assistant professor of law at the Michigan State University School of Law and is a participant in the law school’s health care plan. Plaintiff Julie Taiber is the wife of Professor Candeub and is a beneficiary under the health care plan. At all relevant times, defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) provided a policy of group health insurance under contract with the law school, which provided…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gill v. Bausch & Lomb Supplemental Retirement Income Plan IDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
  2. Karen Briggs v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Karen Briggs v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. Valerie Tegu-Watkins v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API