Transit Casualty Co. v. Transit Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1ConcurrenceLimbaugh, Judge
I concur in the majority’s analysis and conclusion on the merits of the case, but I write separately to suggest a different approach to the “final judgment” issue.
Section 512.020, RSMo 1994, governs appeals in civil cases generally and gives a right to appeal to any party “aggrieved” by a final judgment of the trial court. The majority correctly determines that Pulitzer is an aggrieved party because its “attempt to unseal public records in which it has a legal right was denied.” This is tacit recognition that Pulitzer has a corresponding cause of action, ancillary to the underlying…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Green v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Transit Casualty Co. in Receivership v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Avidan v. Transit Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Ainsworth v. DaltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Angoff v. Casualty Indemnity ExchangeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997