Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Transit Casualty Co. v. Transit Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 24, 2001No. SC 82520Published

1ConcurrenceLimbaugh, Judge

I concur in the majority’s analysis and conclusion on the merits of the case, but I write separately to suggest a different approach to the “final judgment” issue.

Section 512.020, RSMo 1994, governs appeals in civil cases generally and gives a right to appeal to any party “aggrieved” by a final judgment of the trial court. The majority correctly determines that Pulitzer is an aggrieved party because its “attempt to unseal public records in which it has a legal right was denied.” This is tacit recognition that Pulitzer has a corresponding cause of action, ancillary to the underlying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Green v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. Transit Casualty Co. in Receivership v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Avidan v. Transit Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  4. Ainsworth v. DaltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Angoff v. Casualty Indemnity ExchangeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API