Legal Opinion

Angoff v. Casualty Indemnity Exchange

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1997No. WD 53415PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPINDEN, Judge.

Jay Angoff, director of the Department of Insurance, appeals the circuit court’s judgment to terminate the order of rehabilitation entered against Casualty Indemnity Exchange (CIE). Angoff also contests the circuit court’s removing the special deputy appointed by Angoff as CIE’s rehabilitator and restoring CIE Service Corporation as CIE’s attomey-in-fact. We affirm.

CIE is a reciprocal insurance exchange governed by §§ 379.650-.800, RSMo 1994.1 In Yeats v. Dodson, 345 Mo. 196, 127 S.W.2d 652, 655 (1939), the Supreme Court described the operation and function of a reciprocal…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Dardick v. DardickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Wagner v. RuddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Missouri State Life Insurance v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Wysong v. Automobile Underwriters, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Transit Casualty Co. v. Transit Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  2. Koken v. Legion InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. In re Penn Treaty Network America InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Transit Casualty Co. v. Transit Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  5. Transit Casualty Co. v. Transit Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API