Legal Opinion

Carpenter & Pierce Co. v. Rothwell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1926No. Appeal 6PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

'The question is whether goods of a husband in possession of his wife are liable to execution for his debt which antedates the transfer of all his property to her. Plaintiff had judgment against the husband for $150 and levied on personal property in the wife’s possession and alleged to belong to the husband. She filed a property claim with the sheriff; a rule for an interpleader was taken, and was discharged after hearing. She has appealed from that order.

The rule of decision to be applied was considered in Gillespie v. Agnew, 22 Pa. Superior Ct. 557, where it was said:…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coates v. GerlachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  2. Gillespie v. AgnewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Stickney v. BormanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
  4. Swartz v. BachmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Ammon's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lamberton National Bank v. KinestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Secretary of Banking v. Promislo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API