Gillespie v. Agnew
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 68, Jan. T., 1903, by defendant, from order of C. P. Columbia Co., discharging interpleader rule in case of Rose Gillespie v. L. E. Agnew. Rule for an issue to determine title to goods levied upon as the property of a husband, but claimed by the wife. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order discharging rule. cited : Com. v. Burns, 14 Pa. Superior Ct. 248; Book v. Sharpe, 189 Pa. 44.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Moeeison, J.,
Rose Gillespie obtained a judgment against L. E. Agnew, in the court of common pleas of Columbia county a't No. 10, May term, 1902, and issued a fi. fa. thereon to the same number and term. Upon this writ the sheriff levied upon certain goods and chattels which were claimed by Henrietta Agnew, the wife of the defendant in the judgment.
On August 30, 1902, a rule for an issue was. entered for the purpose of determining the title to the property claimed by the wife. On November 24,1902, the court below disposed of this rule as follows:
*558“ Rule discharged as to goods claimed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Book v. DaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Berger & Wirth v. H. W. Juergen & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lamberton National Bank v. KinestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Carpenter & Pierce Co. v. RothwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Anderson Computing Scale Co. v. Seader, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1930
- Borger v. Jones, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1922
- Morris Lumber Co. v. Harrington, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Susquehanna County1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.