Legal Opinion
BRIGHTHOUSE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. WALKER WALTON
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 13, 2024No. 2:22-cv-00485Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRIGHTHOUSE LIFE INSURANCE : CIVIL ACTION COMPANY : : v. : NO. 22-485 : ANTOINETTE WALKER WALTON, : PRESTON HARPER, KADEENA : FULTON : MEMORANDUM MURPHY, J. February 13, 2024 Brighthouse Life Insurance Company asks us to declare that Antoinette Walker-Walton is the sole beneficiary of I-Dean Fulton’s life insurance policy. Because there is no genuine dispute of material fact, we will. Mr. Fulton applied for and was issued a Brighthouse life insurance policy. Ms. Walker- Walton, his then-fiancée, was the policy’s sole…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reginald D. Ware Ware Communications, Inc. v. Rodale Press, Inc. Ware CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Stevens & Ricci IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.