Legal Opinion

Royal Feed & Milling Co. v. Thorn

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1926No. 25489PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

The appellant, Royal Feed & Milling Company, is engaged in the manufacture of mixed foods for animals, and has a general office at Meridian, Miss., in charge of its general manager. It also employed a traveling salesman to sell its products to the trade, and said salesman made a contract with one Stuart, a local dealer at Morton, Miss., for the sale of its food stuff. Stuart sold this food stuff to appellee, Thorn, for use in feeding his horses and mules, and Thorn filed suit against appellant and Stuart for the loss of his animals alleged to have been killed by eating poisoned or damaged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pease & Dwyer Co. v. Somers Planting Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Becker Co. v. ClardyMississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Dulaney v. Jones & RogersMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Dunagin-Whitaker Co. v. MontgomeryMississippi Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harrist v. Spencer-Harris Tool Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  2. F. O. Grey v. Hayes-Sammons Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. Lambert v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Midwest Game Company v. MFA Milling CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Kroger Grocery Co. v. LewellingMississippi Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API