Legal Opinion

Ofisi v. Bnp Paribas S.A.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 2, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2015-2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARY OFISI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 15-2010 (JDB) AL SHAMAL ISLAMIC BANK, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Six years into this litigation, and nearly three years into his client’s involvement in this matter, Martin F. McMahon seeks to withdraw as counsel for Al Shamal Islamic Bank (“Al Shamal”), due to his client’s lack of cooperation and communication. Plaintiffs object, contending that because no replacement counsel has been secured, withdrawal would indefinitely delay this case. For the reasons explained below,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Partridge v. Am. Hosp. Mgmt. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Honda Power Equipment Manufacturing, Inc. v. WoodhouseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  3. Byrd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  4. Sabre International Security v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Laster v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API