Lawrence v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
These appeals arise out of actions on two life insurance policies, consolidated for trial and presenting the same legal questions. The cases were tried to a jury, and a verdict and judgment for appellee was rendered in each case.
The principal questions are (1) whether it was _ error for the court to admit the testimony of certain physicians disclosing information obtained by them in examining and treating the insured, upon the ground that such information was inadmissible under the Michigan statute,1 and (2) whether the court erred in its charge to the jury.
*383We think that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. KayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Fraser v. JennisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Briesenmeister v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Gilchrist v. Mystic Workers of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Bellestri-Fontana v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Great Northern Life Ins. Co. v. VinceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Ranger, Inc. v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. Of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Leonard C. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Miller v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1953
- Ratigan v. American United Life Ins.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1941