Legal Opinion
Johnstone v. Johnstone
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.
On this motion to confirm, the only feature of the learned referee’s report to which objection is made is the amount of alimony awarded. The reference was one to hear and determine the issues (McCleary v. McCleary, 30 Hun, 154; Matthews v. Matthews, 53 id. 244), but the demand for alimony is not an essential part of the cause of action for divorce (Galusha v. Galusha, 138 N. Y. 272; Le Page v. Le Page, 208 App. Div. 458; Averett v. Averett, 110 Misc. 584; affd., 191 App. Div. 948) and is, therefore, not included among the “ issues ” referred. (Bowe v. Bowe, 55 Misc. 403.) To the extent that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- De Brauwere v. . De BrauwereNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Laumeier v. . LaumeierNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Marshall v. . MeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Thiessen v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Van Tinker v. Van TinkerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Biondo v. BiondoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Johnstone v. JohnstoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Rosenblum v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934