Legal Opinion
Cardiaq Valve Technologies, Inc. v. Neovasc, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 6, 2014No. Civil Action No. 14-12405-NMGPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
NATHANIEL M. GORTON, District Judge.
This case arises out of an alleged misuse of confidential information belonging to plaintiff CardiAQ Valve Technologies, Inc. (“CardiAQ”) with respect to a prosthetic heart mitral valve. CardiAQ’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) asserts claims for relief against defendants Neo-vasc, Inc. (“Neovasc”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Neovasc Tiara, Inc. (“Neovasc Tiara”), for 1) correction of in-ventorship, 2) breach of contract, 3) breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, 4) fraud, 5) misappropriation of trade secrets and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Langadinos v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Alternative System Concepts, Inc. v. Synopsys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Better Meat Co. v. Emergy, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Emergy, Inc. v. Better Meat CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Hoffman v. Thras.io Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Northwestern University v. PanaceaNano, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021