Legal Opinion

Trotter v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1897PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Yankton county. Hon. E. G. Smith, Judge. Action to recover on a policy of life insurance. Defendants’ demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and they appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion. The administrator was empowered to compromise with appellants without the approbation in any manner of the county# court, or of the heirs-at-law of the insured.

Read the full summary

Appeal from circuit court, Yankton county. Hon. E. G. Smith, Judge. Action to recover on a policy of life insurance. Defendants’ demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and they appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion. The administrator was empowered to compromise with appellants without the approbation in any manner of the county# court, or of the heirs-at-law of the insured. Moulton v. Holmes, 57 Cal. 341; Wyman’s Appeal, 13 N. H. 18; Choteau v. Suydam, 21 N. Y. 179; Boyd v. Oglesby, 23 Gratt. 674; Chadbourn v. Chadbourn, 9 Allen 173; In re Scott, 1 Redf. 236; § 1588, Cal. Code Civ.…

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

It is alleged in the complaint: “(1) That the defendant the Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association at the times herein stated was, and now is, a corporation duly created and existing'under and by virtue of' the laws of the state of New York. (2) That on or about the third day of October, 1893, at Yankton, South Dakota, said defendant association, in *598consideration of am application for insurance, payment of forty dollars, and the further payment of fifteen dollars within sixty days from said date, received one Daniel L. Hadley, as one of its members, upon consideration of the payment of eleven…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Spitzer v. SpitzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. NieuwenhuisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Turk v. GrossmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Jacquish v. DemingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API