Legal Opinion
Eisenthal v. Wittlock
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 22, 1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages, and for the rescission of a contract of sale of real property based upon fraud, the defendants appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Luciano, J.), entered April 29, 1991, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, entered November 1, 1991, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination.
Ordered that the appeal from the order entered April 29, 1991, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- DiFilippo v. Hidden Ponds AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- McCarter v. CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Kreshover v. BergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fabozzi v. CoppaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Mosca v. KinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- F.A.S.A. Construction Corp. v. DegensheinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Huron Street Realty Corp. v. LorenzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Esposito v. Saxon Home Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.