Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Veiling

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided July 3, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. J. W. CAMMACK, Attorney General; CLIFFORD E. SMITH, Assistant Attorney General, and HUMPHREY, CRAWFORD & MIDDLETON for appellants. ROBERT T. PATTERSON, LEO T. WOLFORD and WILLIAM MARSHALL -BULLITT for appellees. ARTHUR B. B-ENS-INGER and J. VERSER CONNER, amici curiae.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Franklin circuit court adjudging invalid, and enjoining the carrying out of a contract made by the state highway commission with Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., ínc., C. W. McNear & Co. for the sale of tollbridge bonds to the amount of $10,700,000.

The conclusions of the court on the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estes v. State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Frost v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. State Highway Commission of Ky. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. Long v. MayoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  5. Duff v. Knott CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API