Legal Opinion

Easley v. Mortensen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1963No. Calendar 32, Docket 49,816PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

This is a suit for breach of contract. At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ opening statement to the jury the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss on the ground that plaintiffs’ declaration and opening statement failed to state a cause of action. Plaintiffs did not seek to amend or add to either when or after the motion was made. They appeal.

In their brief plaintiffs say:

“Plaintiffs’ central contention is that they listed their mortgaged hotel for sale with defendant realtors, and that defendants promised, over and above the listing agreement, to prevent in any event mortgage foreclosure…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rhoades v. SeidelMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Shirey v. CamdenMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Vida v. Miller Allied Industries, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Bean v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Lister v. SakwinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alexander v. JenningsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Alexander v. JenningsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Ambrose v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Ambrose v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. People v. Recorder's Court JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API