Holmes v. Anderson
New York Supreme Court
Motion by tbe defendant, for a new trial, upon exceptions. The cause was tried at the Chenango circuit in October, 1853, and a verdict was found for the plaintiff. The facts appearing on the trial are stated in the opinion of the court.-
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Mason, J.
This is an action brought against the defendant for burning a barn of the plaintiff, and for cutting trees, &c. The action was tried at the Chenango circuit in *421October, 1853, before Justice Shankland. Upon the trial of the cause it was proved that there were tracks leading to and from the barn, which it was claimed and insisted were the defendant’s tracks. It was also proved that the defendant’s cattle got into the plaintiff’s oats, and damaged the plaintiff. Charles B. Anderson was sworn as a witness for the plaintiff, and gave material evidence to charge the defendant…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Schell v. . PlumbNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- McDougal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of EnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- McFadin v. CatronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Saunders v. City & Suburban RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.