Legal Opinion
Smith v. Holman
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 14, 1968No. 43321PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
1. Where the pleadings were filed prior to
September 1, 1967, the court may elect to deal with them under the procedural law as it existed when the pleadings were filed, in which event provisions of the Civil Practice Act have no application. Abercrombie v. Ledbetter-Johnson Co., 116 Ga. App. 376, 378 (157 SE2d 493).
2. A petition was not subject to general demurrer when it alleged that plaintiff, a resident of Hartford, Alabama, had been defrauded of $36,000 by the defendant Smith, a resident of Fulton County, Georgia, by means of a conspiracy between Smith and one who…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Abercrombie v. Ledbetter-Johnson Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Cheney v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Dortic v. DugasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Arthur v. BrawnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brown v. Techdata Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Gaines v. WolcottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Jim Walter Corp. v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Gibson v. Home Folks Mobile Home Plaza, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1982
- Tower Financial Services, Inc. v. JarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.