Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Brawner
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 19, 1932No. 8452PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
1. Erom the allegations of the petition in this case it appears that the plaintiffs chose to rely upon the representations made by the defendants respecting the terms of the leases and the terms of payment of the rental on the property leased. It is alleged in general terms that these representations were false and fraudulent, and that the plaintiffs were injured by relying and acting upon the same. The petition is defective in that the facts alleged are insufficient to charge actual fraud, as ruled in Emlen v. Roper, 133 Ga. 726 (66 S. E. 934), and Mangham v. Cobb, 160 Ga. 182 (127 S. E.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Martin v. HarwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Emlen v. RoperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Castleberry v. ScandrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
- Mangham v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Robert Falkner & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jackson v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Browning v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Fort Valley Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Lawton v. ByckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Gaultney v. WindhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.