Markevics v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Santucci, J.,
dissents and votes to reverse the order appealed from in the following memorandum in which Thompson, J., joins: In my opinion, the homeowners’ insurance policy issued by the defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Liberty) was never written or intended to provide dram shop coverage, and thus I vote to reverse.
Pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (d), an insurer has an obligation to “give written notice [of its disclaimer] as soon as is reasonably possible * * * to the insured and the injured person or any other claimant.” However, there is no reason for an insurer to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zappone v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Worcester Insurance v. BettenhauserNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Handelsman v. Sea InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Planet Insurance v. Bright Bay Classic Vehicles, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.