Legal Opinion

Moore v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1934No. 817PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By GUERNSEY, J.

Whether the plaintiff was engaged in interstate commerce at the time of his injury, is to be determined by the following rules:.' 1. The test of employment in interstate commerce, which determines the application of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, is whether the employe at the time of the injury was engaged in interstate transpor-i tation, or in any work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it.. 2. The tracks, bridges, roadbed, and equipment of a carrier in actual use in interstate commerce have a definite interstate character as instruments of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Coughlan v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. Shepard v. JacobsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Puhlman v. Excelsior Express & Standard Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Kusturin v. Chicago & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lees v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API