Mower v. Hanford, Thayer & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY. This is an action brought by Hanford, Thayer, & Co., and Bertbold, Rozier & Co., judgment creditors of Burideo and Mower, two of Appellants in tbis action, to set aside certain conveyances of real estate executed by Samuel Burkleo and wife and William H. Mower and wife — and by Samuel Burk-leo and wife separately — and by William H. Mower and wife separately, — to Martin Mower, Jr., executed on the 12th and 13th November,…
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY. This is an action brought by Hanford, Thayer, & Co., and Bertbold, Rozier & Co., judgment creditors of Burideo and Mower, two of Appellants in tbis action, to set aside certain conveyances of real estate executed by Samuel Burkleo and wife and William H. Mower and wife — and by Samuel Burk-leo and wife separately — and by William H. Mower and wife separately, — to Martin Mower, Jr., executed on the 12th and 13th November, 1857, a portion of which real estate is situate in the State of Wisconsin, and another portion situate in the State of…
1Opinion of the Court
*542By the Oourt —
Atwatek, J.
— -Th¿ counsel for the Respondents contends' that this Court has no jurisdiction as to the order of May 25th, directing the delivery of certain personal property, and the order refusing a new trial, on the ground that the appeals from those orders are not in time. In the view taken of the appeal from the judgment,-it is unnecessary to decide whether those orders fall within the 25iA section, Oomp. Stats., p. 673.
It is further contended that on appeal from the judgment, this Court cannot review the order refusing a new trial. The motion for a new trial was heard on a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rankin v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bahnsen v. GilbertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Benton v. SnyderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Mayall v. BurkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865