Mayall v. Burke
Supreme Court of Minnesota
A motion was made at a special term of tbe District Court of Hennepin County on tbe part of tbe plaintiffs, for an order to change tbe place of trial of this action, based upon tbe affidavit of one of tbe plaintiffs, and tbe reply in tbe action.
Read the full summary
A motion was made at a special term of tbe District Court of Hennepin County on tbe part of tbe plaintiffs, for an order to change tbe place of trial of this action, based upon tbe affidavit of one of tbe plaintiffs, and tbe reply in tbe action. Upon tbe bearing of tbe motion, tbe Court made tbe following order : “Tbe counsel for the defendants objects to tbe reception of tbe affidavit, on which this motion is claimed to be based, on tbe ground that the same and also the reply of plaintiffs to the answer of Catharine Burke, are scandalous and impertinent. An inspection of these papers has…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court —
Berry, J.
— The Clerk b'elow appended to his return to this Court, and over the following certificate, two papers, one purporting to be a change of venue, and the other a reply to the answer of the defendants in this action :
“State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin, ss : — I, H. O. Hamlin, Clerk of the District Court for Hennepin County, do hereby certify that the papers next preceding this certificate and next after my first certificate of attestation in the foregoing entitled action, are the identical papers referred to in said order or decision denying said motion, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mower v. Hanford, Thayer & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
- Myrick v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
- Daniels v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858