Legal Opinion

Clairday v. the Lilly Co.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 19, 2006No. CA 05-696Published

1Opinion of the Court

234 S.W.3d 347 (2006)

Phillip CLAIRDAY, Appellant

v.

THE LILLY COMPANY, Employer and Royal Sun Alliance Insurance Co., Carrier, Appellees.

No. CA 05-696.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions IV, I & II.

April 19, 2006.

John Bartlett, Jonesboro, AR, for appellant.

Roberts Law Firm, P.A., by: Jeremy Swearingen and Emily A. Neal, Little Rock, AR, for appellees.

OLLY NEAL, Judge.

This is an appeal from the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission's (Commission) decision that appellant, Phillip Clairday, failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he was entitled to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Poulan Weed Eater v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Mad Butcher, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Geo Specialty Chemical, Inc. v. ClinganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Air Compressor Equipment v. SwordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Searcy Industrial Laundry, Inc. v. FerrenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API