Legal Opinion

Whitworth v. Pelton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Garnishment. Principal defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is a proceeding in garnishment, and was tried before the Kent circuit court, without a jury, where the plaintiffs had judgment for the sum of $150.03 •and costs. The cause was defended by the principal defendant, who now brings error. Fourteen errors are •assigned. A bill of exceptions was settled, and the whole proceedings are before us. At the request of the counsel for the principal defendant, the coijrt made a finding of facts and conclusions of law.

It appears from the record that on August 6, 1884, the plaintiffs brought suit against said Charles H. Pelton and one Aldrich W. Pelton,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Snyder v. WinsorMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sandusky Grain Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Vyse v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Home Savings Bank v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Shank v. WoodworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Township of Forest v. American Bonding Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API