Legal Opinion

Cripps v. Cripps

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

This suit presents the single question, to-wit: May a Chancery Court order the sale of a house and lot for a partition upon the petition of the remaindermen when *69the widow is entitled to homestead and dower and does not consent thereto?

The answer to this question has apparently caused some confusion because the answer is one of those yes, but answers. The bill was filed by the children of Willie James Cripps, deceased, against his widow for the purpose of having the real estate left by the deceased sold and the “homestead and dower assigned out of the profits thereof, and the remainder…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Arrowood v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Trotter v. City of MaryvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Bierce v. JamesTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Holt v. HamlinTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  5. McConnell v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Puryear v. BelcherTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Vick v. VickTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API