Legal Opinion

Hogan v. . Central Park, North and East River Rd. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

“ This action was begun February 10, 1888, to recover, under section 1902 of-the Code of Civil Procedure, damages of the defendant for having, as it is alleged, on the 18th day of August, 1887, negligently caused the death of the plaintiff's son, a lad twelve years old.

Read the full summary

“ This action was begun February 10, 1888, to recover, under section 1902 of-the Code of Civil Procedure, damages of the defendant for having, as it is alleged, on the 18th day of August, 1887, negligently caused the death of the plaintiff's son, a lad twelve years old. At the date of the accident the defendant owned and operated a surface railroad in Fifty-ninth, and in other streets in the city of Hew York, using in part cars drawn by one horse and managed solely by a driver. About nine o'clock in the evening of August eighteenth, the decedent and several boys not intending to pay their…

1Opinion of the Court

Follett, Ch. J.,

reads for reversal and new trial.

All concur, Haight and Brown, JJ., in result, except Bradley, J., dissenting.

Judgment reversed.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ansteth v. Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Jackson v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Broderick v. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Davis v. MarvineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Ansteth v. Buffalo Railway Co.Superior Court of Buffalo · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API