Jones v. DeNotaris
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM
PRATTER, District Judge.
This case presents novel questions of law in the Third Circuit: first, whether a plaintiff alleging violations of the Randolph-Sheppard Act (“RSA”), 20 U.S.C. § 107 et seq., may proceed directly against a state licensing agency and its officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and, second, whether he may proceed without “exhausting” the procedures explicitly provided for *590by the RSA. For the reasons that follow, the Court answers both questions in the negative.
I. THE RANDOLPH-SHEPPARD ACT
“For the purposes of providing blind persons with remunerative…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Henderson v. Missouri Department of Social Services, Family Support Divison Rehabilitation Services for the BlindDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
- MOODNEY v. ADELMANDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF SERVICES FOR THE BLIND V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION REHABILITATION SERVICES ADMINISTRATIONDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019