Legal Opinion

Jones v. DeNotaris

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 2015No. Civil Action No. 13-4500PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM

PRATTER, District Judge.

This case presents novel questions of law in the Third Circuit: first, whether a plaintiff alleging violations of the Randolph-Sheppard Act (“RSA”), 20 U.S.C. § 107 et seq., may proceed directly against a state licensing agency and its officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and, second, whether he may proceed without “exhausting” the procedures explicitly provided for *590by the RSA. For the reasons that follow, the Court answers both questions in the negative.

I. THE RANDOLPH-SHEPPARD ACT

“For the purposes of providing blind persons with remunerative…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Missouri Department of Social Services, Family Support Divison Rehabilitation Services for the BlindDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
  2. MOODNEY v. ADELMANDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
  3. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF SERVICES FOR THE BLIND V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION REHABILITATION SERVICES ADMINISTRATIONDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API