Shelby v. Moore
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.
— Appellee as assignee of Cad Walter Pitts instituted this action against appellants and Anna E. Pitts to recover the value of certain grain alleged to have been converted by said appellants. The action was dismissed as to Anna E. Pitts. At the request of appellants the court made a special finding of facts and stated conclusions of law - thereon. On the facts as found, the court, as a conclusion *372of law, adjudged, that appellee was entitled to recover against appellants $82.20. To this conclusion of law, appellants, at the proper time, excepted. The errors assigned are (1) that the complaint…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Laverty v. . SnethenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Kennard v. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Finney v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Kidder v. BiddleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Smith v. Shell Lake Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Keim v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909