Legal Opinion

Coward v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2016No. 14-16378Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Dana Coward appeals the dismissal of her fourth amended complaint against JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JP Morgan”) alleging fraud in the origination of her mortgage loan. The district court dismissed the complaint without leave to amend for failure to comply with the administrative requirements set out in the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(13)(D), and for failure to adequately plead fraud under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

On appeal Coward…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Bly-Magee v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Dale Bozzio v. Emi Group LtdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API