Legal Opinion
Fund for Animals, Inc. v. Lujan
District Court, D. Montana
Decided January 27, 1991No. CV 90-142-M-CCLPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
LOVELL, District Judge.
The Fund for Animals (Fund) seeks to restrain Defendants from taking any further action which results in the shooting of bison outside the boundaries of Yellowstone National Park. Plaintiff also seeks to require Defendants to take such affirmative steps as may be necessary to prevent migration of bison out of Yellowstone National Park. Finally, the Fund seeks to preliminarily enjoin the Defendants from taking any action which results in reduction of the bison population pending completion of an environmental impact statement…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Joseph Gelb v. Royal Globe Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Robert Montgomery Hooker, Appellant-Petitioner v. Frank X. Klein, United States Marshal, N.D. Of California, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- North Fork Preservation Ass'n v. Department of State LandsMontana Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cold Mountain v. GarberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Cold Mountain v. GarberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- InterTribal Bison Cooperative v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1998
- Western Watersheds Project v. SalazarDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2011
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.