Legal Opinion
Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. Babbitt
District Court, D. Montana
Decided December 19, 1996No. CV 96-82-H-CCLPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LOVELL, District Judge.
In this ease, several conservation groups and an individual challenge a federal action under the Administrative Procedure Act (the “APA”) and the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). The Plaintiffs currently seek to enjoin implementation of the Interim Bison Management Plan (the “1996 Interim Plan”), which in 1995 was drafted jointly by the' State of Montana (“Montana”), the National Park Service (“NPS”), and the Animal and Plant Inspection Service (“APHIS”), and has since been revised and finalized in 1996. This matter is before the court on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cold Mountain v. GarberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Cold Mountain v. GarberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- InterTribal Bison Cooperative v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1998
- Western Watersheds Project v. SalazarDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2011
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. BosworthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.