Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-183L (Filed: January 9, 2020) ) IDEKER FARMS, INC., et al., ) Motion to Amend Answer, RCFC 15; ) Taking; Fifth Amendment; Affirmative Plaintiffs, ) Defense; Sponenbarger; Relative ) Benefits; Futility; Flooding v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) R. Dan Boulware, St. Joseph, MO, for plaintiffs. Edwin H. Smith, Seth C. Wright, and, R. Todd Ehlert, St. Joseph, MO, and Benjamin D. Brown and Laura Alexander, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Terry M. Petrie, Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- A & D Auto Sales, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- United States v. SponenbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.