Legal Opinion

Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 9, 2020No. 14-183Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-183L (Filed: January 9, 2020) ) IDEKER FARMS, INC., et al., ) Motion to Amend Answer, RCFC 15; ) Taking; Fifth Amendment; Affirmative Plaintiffs, ) Defense; Sponenbarger; Relative ) Benefits; Futility; Flooding v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) R. Dan Boulware, St. Joseph, MO, for plaintiffs. Edwin H. Smith, Seth C. Wright, and, R. Todd Ehlert, St. Joseph, MO, and Benjamin D. Brown and Laura Alexander, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Terry M. Petrie, Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. A & D Auto Sales, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. SponenbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API